Keywords
multiple means of engagement
student engagement
sense of belonging
inclusive chemistry education
How to Cite
Abstract
Engagement and a sense of belonging are essential to inclusive education, particularly for students with education needs and disabilities (SEND) in chemistry classrooms. This study investigates how secondary school chemistry teachers in Indonesia apply the Multiple Means of Engagement (MME) principle of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework to enhance participation and inclusion for students with SEND. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 11 experienced chemistry teachers and were analyzed thematically. The findings reveal that teachers adopted strategies such as offering task choices, integrating culturally relevant contexts, providing affirming feedback, and encouraging self-reflection. These practices were perceived to strengthen students’ motivation, participation, and sense of belonging. Nonetheless, implementation was uneven, constrained by limited conceptual understanding and institutional barriers. The study concludes that UDL-informed engagement strategies have the potential to foster both cognitive and affective inclusion and highlights the importance of professional development that bridges global pedagogical theory with local classroom realities.
References
Aidoo, B. A Reflective Study on Adopting Inquiry-Based Science Teaching Methods. Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res. 2024, 6 (1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00119-3
Allen, K. A.; Bowles, T. Belonging as a Guiding Principle in the Education of Adolescents. Aust. J. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 2012, 12, 108–119.
Almumen, H. A. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) across Cultures: The Application of UDL in Kuwaiti Inclusive Classrooms. SAGE Open.. 2020, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969674
Alquraini, T. A.; Rao, S. M. Assessing Teachers’ Knowledge, Readiness, and Needs to Implement Universal Design for Learning in Classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 2020, 24 (1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1452298
American Chemical Society Lab Skills. https://www.acs.org/education/policies/acs-approval-program/events-resources/teaching-labs-covid/lab-skills.html.
Arney, M.; Rozek, C. Fostering School Belonging for Students in Special Education; PRiME Center. St. Louis University, 2024.
Arslan, G. School Belongingness, Well-Being, and Mental Health among Adolescents: Exploring the Role of Loneliness. Aust. J. Psychol. 2021, 73 (1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1904499
Basham, J. D.; Blackorby, J.; Marino, M. T. Opportunity in Crisis: The Role of Universal Design for Learning in Educational Redesign. Learn. Disabil. A Contemp. J. 2020, 18 (1), 71–91.
Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3 (2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, C.; Douthwaite, A.; Donnelly, M.; Shay, M. Connected Belonging: A Relational and Identity-Based Approach to Schools’ Role in Promoting Child Wellbeing. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2025, 51, 1927–1965. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4112
Capp, M. J. Teacher Confidence to Implement the Principles, Guidelines, and Checkpoints of Universal Design for Learning. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 2020, 24 (7), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482014
Carter, E. W.; Gustafson, J. R.; Sreckovic, M. A.; Dykstra Steinbrenner, J. R.; Pierce, N. P.; Bord, A.; Stabel, A.; Rogers, S.; Czerw, A.; Mullins, T. Efficacy of Peer Support Interventions in General Education Classrooms for High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2016, 38 (4), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516672067
CAST UDL and the Learning Brain. Author: Wakefield, MA 2018. http:/www.cast.org/our-work/publications/2018/udl-learning-brain-neuroscience.html
Chhetri, S. B.; Baniya, R. Influence of Student-Faculty Interaction on Graduate Outcomes of Undergraduate Management Students: The Mediating Role of Behavioral, Emotional and Cognitive Engagement. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2022, 20 (2), 100640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100640
Cumming, T. M.; Gilanyi, L. ‘Our Classes Are like Mainstream School Now’: Implementing Universal Design for Learning at a Special School. Australas. J. Spec. Incl. Educ. 2023, 47 (2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2023.7
Daoayan Biaddang, L. M.; Caroy, A. A. Student Voice and Choice in the Virtual Classroom: Engagement Strategies. Discov. Educ. 2024, 3 (1), 162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00269-6
Efendi, M.; Pradipta, R. F.; Dewantoro, D. A.; Ummah, U. S.; Edivanto, E.; Yasin, M. H. M. Inclusive Education for Student with Special Needs at Indonesian Public Schools. Int. J. Instr. 2022, 15 (2), 967–980. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2022.15253a
Erdoğdu, M. Y. The Mediating Role of School Engagement in the Relationship between Attitude toward Learning and Academic Achievement. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 2019, 7 (2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.2p.75
Ferlazzo, L. Student Engagement: Key to Personalized Learning. ASCD. 2017, 74 (6), 28–33.
Fleming, E. C. UDL for Inclusive Teaching: Offering Choice to Increase Belonging through Technology. J. Teach. Learn. With Technol. 2023, 12 (1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v12i1.36327
Fränkel, S.; Sterken, M.; Stinken-Rösner, L. From Barriers to Boosters: Initial Teacher Education for Inclusive Science Education. Front. Educ. 2023, 8, 1191619. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1191619
Gan, Z.; Liu, F.; Nang, H. The Role of Self-Efficacy, Task Value, and Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations in Students’ Feedback Engagement in English Learning. Behav. Sci. (Basel). 2023, 13 (5), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050428
Gheyssens, E.; Griful-Freixenet, J.; Struyven, K. Differentiated Instruction as an Approach to Establish Effective Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms. In Effective Teaching Around the World; 2023; pp 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_30
Hall, C. M. The Impact of Family Engagement on Student Achievement. Networks An Online J. Teach. Res. 2020, 22 (2), 1327. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1327
Han, C.; Lei, J. Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs towards Universal Design for Learning Framework: A Scoping Review. Sage Open. 2024, 14 (3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241272032
Hassard, J.; Pendergast, D.; Hay, S. Sense of Belonging Pre/Post Transition to Secondary School: Privileging Student Voice. RMLE Online. 2024, 47 (3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2023.2299502
Israel, M.; Kester, B.; Williams, J. J.; Ray, M. J. Equity and Inclusion through UDL in K-6 Computer Science Education: Perspectives of Teachers and Instructional Coaches. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 2022, 2 (3), 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3513138
James, W.; Lamons, K.; Spilka, R.; Bustamante, C.; Scanlon, E.; Chini, J. J. Hidden Walls: STEM Course Barriers Identified by Students with Disabilities. Physics Education Research Conference. 2019, PREPRINT arxiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.02905 and https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.James
Lambert, R.; McNiff, A.; Schuck, R.; Imm, K.; Zimmerman, S. “UDL Is a Way of Thinking”; Theorizing UDL Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices. Front. Educ. 2023, 8, 1145293. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1145293
Li, J.; Xue, E. Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behav. Sci. (Basel). 2023, 13 (1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Lowrey, K. A.; Hollingshead, A.; Howery, K.; Bishop, J. B. More than One Way: Stories of UDL and Inclusive Classrooms. Res. Pract. Pers. with Sev. Disabil. 2017, 42 (4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917711668
Markou, P.; Diaz-Noguera, M. D. Investigating the Implementation of Universal Design for Learning in Greek Secondary and Second Chance Schools through Teachers’ Reflections Dayle Learning. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 2022, 11 (3), 1851–1863. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1851
Merriam, S. B.; Tisdell, E. J. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed.; Wiley, 2016.
Meyer, A.; Rose, D. H.; Gordon, D. Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice; CAST Professional Publishing, 2014.
Moleko, M. M. Multiple Means of Engagement Strategies for Maximising the Learning of Mathematics in Pandemic-Regulated Classrooms. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 2021, 20 (8), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.5
Morris, D. L. Rethinking Science Education Practices: Shifting from Investigation-Centric to Comprehensive Inquiry-Based Instruction. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15 (1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010073
Niazi, M.-R. K.; Asghar, M. A.; Ali, R. Effect of Science Laboratory Environment on Cognitive Development of Students. Pakistan J. Distance Online Learn. 2018, IV (1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.30971/pjdol.v4i1.409
Okolo, C. M.; Diedrich, J. Universal Design for Learning and Access to Science Education: Perspectives from Students with Disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 2019, 25 (4), 9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-65382519000400009
Osterman, K. F. Students’ Need for Belonging in the School Community. Rev. Educ. Res. 2000, 70 (3), 323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170786
Patzak, A.; Zhang, X. Blending Teacher Autonomy Support and Provision of Structure in the Classroom for Optimal Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2025, 37, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2
Pollak, I.; Stiehl, K. A. M.; Birchwood, J.; Schrank, B.; Zechner, K. A.; Wiesner, C.; Woodcock, K. A. Promoting Peer Connectedness through Social-Emotional Learning: Evaluating the Intervention Effect Mechanisms and Implementation Factors of a Social-Emotional Learning Programme for 9 to 12-Year-Olds. J. Youth Adolesc. 2024, 53 (1), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01871-x
Qu, X.; Cross, B. UDL for Inclusive Higher Education—What Makes Group Work Effective for Diverse International Students in UK? Int. J. Educ. Res. 2024, 123, 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102277
Rao, K.; Torres, C.; Smith, S. J. Digital Tools and UDL-Based Instructional Strategies to Support Students with Disabilities Online. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 2021, 36 (2) 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643421998327
Rao, K.; Meo, G. Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. Sage Open. 2016, 6 (4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
Roberts, Carly A; Saliba, Elizabeth H; Stewart, Erin M Expanding Science Learning for Students With Complex Support Needs: A Case Study. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2024, 07419325231225441. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231225441
Roberts, C. A.; Saliba, E. H.; Stewart, E. M. Expanding Science Learning for Students with Complex Support Needs: A Case Study. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2024, 07419325231225441. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231225441
Shernoff, D. J. Optimal Learning Environments to Promote Student Engagement; Levesque, R. J. R., Ed.; Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7089-2
Siacor, K. H.; Ng, B.; Liu, W. C. Fostering Student Motivation and Engagement through Teacher Autonomy Support: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Int. J. Instr. 2024, 17 (2), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17232a
Side, S.; Munawwarah, M.; Alqadri, Z. The Impact of Cognitive Knowledge on Laboratory Skills Development in Chemistry Students: A Correlational Study. J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA. 2024, 10 (12), 9938–9944. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i12.9390
Slaten, C. D.; Ferguson, J. K.; Allen, K. A.; Brodrick, D. V; Waters, L. School Belonging: A Review of the History, Current Trends, and Future Directions. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 2016, 33 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2016.6
Stake, R. E. Multiple Case Study Analysis; Guilford Press, 2006.
Stremfel, U.; Sterman Ivancic, K.; Peras, I. Addressing the Sense of School Belonging Among All Students? A Systematic Literature Review. Eur. J. Investig. Heal. Psychol. Educ. 2024, 14 (11), 2901–2917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14110190
Umarji, O.; McPartlan, P.; Moeller, J.; Li, Q.; Shaffer, J.; Eccles, J. The Motivational System of Task Values and Anticipated Emotions in Daily Academic Behavior. Motiv. Emot. 2021, 45 (5), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09898-y
UNESCO Inclusion and Education: All Means All – Global Education Monitoring Report 2020; 2020.
Wang, M. T.; Degol, J. L. School Climate: A Review of the Construct, Measurement, and Impact on Student Outcomes. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2016, 28, 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
Wilkins, N. J.; Verlenden, J. M. V; Szucs, L. E.; Johns, M. M. Classroom Management and Facilitation Approaches That Promote School Connectedness. J Sch Heal. 2023, 93 (7), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13279
Wu, D.; Dong, X. Autonomy Support, Peer Relations, and Teacher-Student Interactions: Implications for Psychological Well-Being in Language Learning. Front. Psychol. 2024, 15, 1358776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358776
Wulayalin, K. A.; Suprihatiningrum, J. Creating Accessible Chemistry Content for Students with Disabilities: Findings from Schools Providing Inclusive Education in Indonesia. J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA. 2023, 10 (5), 2199–2210. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6755
Yamamoto, S.; Alverson, C. Y.; McCoid-Goudy, L.; Castle, H.; Burr, J. STEM and High School Students with Disabilities: A Qualitative Review of the Research Literature. J. Sci. Educ. 2022, 25 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.14.0006
Yang, D.; Chen, P.; Wang, H.; Wang, K.; Huang, R. Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Student Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review of Longitudinal Studies. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 925955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955
Yin, R. K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed.; SAGE Publication, 2014.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Eclética Química