Keywords
difficulty learning
misconception
How to Cite
Abstract
Chemical bonds are one of the materials in chemistry that are abstract in nature so that many students have difficulty learning chemical bonding material. This study aims to identify the learning difficulties frequently faced by students in understanding chemical bonding materials and various misconceptions that commonly occur in their understanding. Data collection was carried out using a systematic literature review method with several predetermined criteria. The result is that the learning difficulties experienced by students are caused by many factors, one of which is conceptual error or misconception. At present, many methods have been developed to identify students’ misconceptions about chemical bonding material such as diagnostic tests such as two-tier, three-tier and four-tier diagnostics.
References
Arslan, H. O.; Cigdemoglu, C.; Moseley, C. A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International journal of science education. 2012, 34 (11), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618
Chen, C.; Sonnert, G.; Sadler, P. M.; Sasselov, D.; Fredericks, C. The impact of student misconceptions on student persistence in a MOOC. J. Res. Sci. Teaching. 2020, 57 (6), 879–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21616
Ebiati, E.; Asrial, A.; Hasibuan, M. Sensitivity of two-tier and three-tier tests in detecting student’s misconceptions of chemical bonding. J. Chem. Educ. 2020, 12 (2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i2.19405
Fadillah, A.; Salirawati, D. Analysis of misconceptions of chemical bonding among tenth grade senior high school students using a two-tier test. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2021 (1), 080002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062821
Gudyanga, E.; Madambi, T. Students’ misconceptions about bonding and chemical structures in chemistry. Dyke. 2014, 8 (1), 24–40.
Haris, M.; Wahidah, S. Analysis of Difficulties in Learning Chemical Bonds in View of Misconceptions of Class X Students of SMA Negeri 3 Mataran. MIPA Incandescent Journal. 2018, 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v6i2.127
Horton, C. Student alternative conception in chemistry. Calif J. Sci Educ. 2007, 7, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560050
Islami, D.; Suryaningsih, S.; Bahriah, E. S. Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on the Concept of Chemical Bonds using the Four-Tier Multiple-Choice Test (4TMC). JRPK: Res. J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 9 (1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.091.03
Kaltakci-Gurel, D.; Eryilmaz, A.; McDermott, L. C. Development and application of a fourtier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2017, 35 (2), 238–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094
Mahmudah, A.; Nahadi, N.; Firman, H. Identification of student’s misconceptions in chemical bonding topic using four-tier diagnostic test. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2020, 1521, 042059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042059
Margaretha, B. P.; Muchson, M.; Hakimah, N.; Rokhim, D.A.; Herunata, H.; Yahmin, M. dan. Identification of Misconceptions on Chemical Equilibrium Material in High School Students Using a Web-Based Three Tier Test. J. Chem. Educ. Innov. 2022, 16 (1), 12615.
Meltafina, M.; Wiji, W.; Mulyani, S. Misconceptions and threshold concepts in chemical bonding. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2019, 1157, 042030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042030
Muchtar, Z.; Harizal. Analyzing of Students’ Misconceptions on Acid-Base Chemistry at Senior High Schools in Medan. Journal of Education and Practice. 2012, 3 (15), 65–74.
Qodriyah et al. Identification of Misconceptions Of Class XI Students of Sma Negeri 4 Malang on Hydrocarbon Materials Using Three Tier Diagnostic Instruments. Journal of Chemical Education Innovatio. 2020, 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v8i3.2919
Rohmah, R. S.; Sholichah, N.; Pratiwi, Y. N.; Analita, R. N. Analysis of Student’s Chemical Bonding Misconception with A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal Tadris Chemistry. 2022, 7 (2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v7i2.20343
Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, S.; Dasna, I. W. Analysis of Chemical Misconceptions and Its Diagnostic Instruments: Literature Review. J. Chem. Educ. Innov. 2023a, 17 (1), 13697. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v17i1.34245
Rokhim, D. A.; Widarti, H. R.; Sutrisno, S. Five-Tier Instrument to Identify Students’ Misconceptions and Representation: A Systematic Literature Review. Orbital: Electron. J. Chem. 2023b, 15, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v15i4.17709
Safitri A. F.; Widarti H. R.; Sukarianingsih D. Identify understanding of the concept of chemical bonds. J. Chem. Learning. 2018, 3 (1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v3i12018p041
Sen, S.; Yilmaz, A. The development of a three-tier chemical bonding concept test. J. Turk. Sci. Educ. 2017, 14 (1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10193a
Setiawan, D.; Cahyono, E.; Kurniawan, C. Identification and Analysis of Misconceptions in Chemical Bonding Material Using a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument. J. Innov. Sci. Educ. 2017, 6 (2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V6I2.15580
Setiawan, N. C. E.; Ilahi, P. R. Identification of Misconceptions in Chemical Bonding Materials Using Three Tier Diagnostic Tests. J. Nat. Sci. Integr. 2022, 5 (1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v5i1.16860
Subini, N. Learning Psychology; Mentari Pustaka, 2012.
Suparno, P. Misconceptions & Changes in the Concept of Physics Education; Grasindo, 2013.
Synder, H. Literature Review As a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Taber, K. S. Challenging Misconceptions inthe Chemistry Classroom: Resources to Support Teachers. Educació Química. 2009, 4, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2003.02.27
Utami, G. R.; Firman, H.; Nahadi, N. Development of a computer based two-tier multiple choice diagnostic test to identify misconceptions on chemical bonding. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1157, 042033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042033
Utomo, A. P.; Narulita, E.; Yuana, K.; Fikri, K.; Wahono, B. Students’ errors in solving science reasoning-domain of trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Indonesian Sci. Educ. J. 2018, 7 (1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.11352
Uyulgan, M. A.; Akkuzu, N.; Alpat, S. Assessing the students’ understanding related tomolecular geometry using a two-tier diagnostic test. J. Balt. Sci. Educ. 2014, 13 (1), 839–841. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.839
Warsito, J. Subandi, S.; Parlan, P. Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on the Topic of Chemical Bonds and Their Improvements with the ECIRR Learning Model (Elicit, Confront, Identify, Resolve, Reinforce). Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development. 2020, 5 (11), 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14158
Widarti, H. R.; Permanasari, A.; Mulyani, S. Student misconception on redox titration (a challenge on the course implementation through cognitive dissonance based on the multiple representations). Indonesian Science Education Journal. 2016, 5 (1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5790
Sabrina, R. Identification of Student Learning Difficulties in the Material of Chemical Bonds at SMAS Muslimat Samalanga Bireuen. Thesis, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. 2018. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/4610
Sahriani, C. Analysis of Learning Difficulties of Class X Mathematics and Natural Sciences Students of SMA Negeri 3 Tanjungpinang on Chemical Bonding Material. Thesis, Raja Ali Haji Maritime University. 2019. http://repositori.umrah.ac.id/id/eprint/1863
Yani, S.N.W. Diagnostics of the Relationship of Prior Knowledge with Learning Difficulties in Class X High School Chemistry Materials in Solok City. Thesis, Padang State University; 2018. http://repository.unp.ac.id/id/eprint/24849
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Eclética Química